Which is Worse..?

[Smoo]

Hello.  I was chatting tsm89 recently and we got into discussing which seemed worse: to take a bust when you haven't experienced one in a long while, or to take one when they are already still sore from a prior bust.  My thought was when you haven't taken one in a while as even though you know it hurts, there's part of it you mentally just kind of forget.  I don't get it often, only in sessions which can sometimes be a year or two apart.  He was of the other view, that when they're sore, its much worse as they already can take less.  He gets it much more often than I, so he experiences busts when still sore much more, as opposed to the long term spacing.  We both agreed with the other person too and could see their point!

So, curious what others think!  Which is worse?

[Rich]

Worst be far is right after cumming! 

[Foo Bar]

It's worse when the nuts are still sore from yesterday (or earlier today).

There were a couple periods when my lady friend was in a bad mood for a month at a time. She didn't just bust me daily - she completely defeated me.  Sobbing, tears, profuse begging, once or twice a day every day. Balls bruised, ego crushed, will broken, total submission.  Those were the hardest ballbustings I've ever experienced.

[bbandstuff]

some of my hardest, most brutal sessions happen when i haven’t been busted in a long time. it takes a few hits to adjust, so the first couple minutes of the session are rough, but then i can just take a lot, since i’m fresh.

 when i’m already sore, there’s a hard limit to what i can take going into it. plus, i’m not craving it as much, so there isn’t as much drive to take it, which leads to it hurting more.