Tequila, Testicles vs Toes!!! (My 60 yard field goal)

[greeneyedsusan]

Last summer (2009), one of my good friends, Ashley and I paid a relaxing visit to a local pub after a nice day at the beach. It was a Wednesday so the pub wasn’t crowded at all, just the Bartender, three other guys at the end of the bar and the two of us. Ashley and I decided to go out on the dance floor and do a little innocent dirty dancing. While we were on the floor one of the three guys at the end of the bar walked over, the one that was in the worst shape sober wise. He worked his way onto the dance floor, he was so inebriated (*_-) and stunk of booze, he muscled his way in between the two of us. He then started rubbing his ass in my crotch and then walked over and started rubbing his crotch on Ashley’s butt. Ashley turned to me and said "this one is yours; if you don't take it I'll do it." The guy had no clue what that was about, he turned to me like I wanted him. I looked at him blankly then I swung my foot up like i was kicking a 60 yard field goal. You know how the sac sticks out a bit in front of the crotch? Well my foot just hit that, HIS TESTICLES!!!!! The top of my toes connected with his balls and my foot went up through his balls and nearly to his chin. If I was another inch or two away (2 – 5 cm), I would have missed. All he was wearing were flimsy board shorts; he had very little protection against the Pumas i was wearing (similar to the ones pictured below).

The guy just dropped face first and then he curled up into a ball on the dance floor. The look on his face was priceless, he actually became quite sober instantly it seemed. Two seconds later he was in the middle of the floor and started to cough and spitting while in the fetal position, I thought he was going to puke on the dance floor. His friends gathered him up and brought him outside. About five minutes later one of his buddies came in and paid their tab and bought us a round of drinks and told the bartender that he was sorry for his friend’s actions, he said "my friend becomes an asshole when he gets drunk on Tequila." I notice the bartender became very friendly with me, I think I turned her on ;)

[micmac]

Ann, I join with your last sentence.

[micmac]

No interest from my side in a special thread on something like hairsplitting over a place for having entertainment.

Just what mere logics makes conclude from what you lastly gave:

If it is such special and extreme to rub a scrotch to another, the most typical equivalence in reply were to do the same in return, or better: making a joke of somebody, who starts this way.

The candidate of the reported story only had learnt: it is wise to nail a woman into the ground before doing what he did. Surprislingly and unexpectedly (naturally) as this finally grants the success.

 

[Goalie]

micmac, you based your entire post on your false and tendentious interpretation of my ' common rule'.

 

Rubbing crotches with a complete stranger uninvitedly is a special and extreme case, rather than the equivalent definition of, 'touching someone in a manner, that can be understood by the touched to be an offense.

 

If you wish to continue discussion this, I think you should create a separate thread.

[micmac]

Okay, BBAuthor, let´s leave the previous args aside and focus on the common rule, you finally had defined. It says: if somebody touches the other in a manner, that can be understood by the touched to be an offense, this one is entitled for various kinds of severe bodily harm. Well then. It here starts from gesture, so surely also will include words, calling names, thus anything, that can be understood to be a threat. Understood by the adressed, or who thinks to be adressed. Since it is a common rule and according to our understanding, what are common privileges, this includes anybody, beeing adressed, as well as any kind of adresser likewise accordingly. It will happen, that a secretary in office occasionally touches a collegue. Not really avoidable. This then is entitled (according to this rule) to rape her instantly, or - according to daily moods - to mess her up as he wants. Hm. Could become kind of job-pressure-relief. Sounds interesting. I well remember such moments, that had a lot others than occasional causes and that this likely could have made my pressure-relief (if allowed). Contemplating this, there occurs a row of people and moments of similar pattern, now candidates for the new rule. It could be checked, whether past span of time makes a difference for getting me entitled to execute the new rule. Since the rule is as well general as common, it will not care about sexes and age and also could include the combination children/adult. I once had a teacher term with kids of "difficult background" and as far as I remember had found some relief then, seeing the one or other hung to a pole with the neck. I did not notice, the new rule insists in only one certain kind of execution. Explicitely allowed by sample is, to use surprise and unexpected action to make sure, this one leads to success of starter. That sounds pretty easy so far. I would say this is an interesting new rule, that could give significant change to lots of things.

[Goalie]

micmac, you addressed Susan in your last post, however, judging by the content and since so far I'm the only one who responded to your earlier post, I'll have to assume you were responding to me. Therefore let me make it clear that I'm not talking on anyone's behalf here but my own. I'm only expressing my own opinion and my own opinion is that, drunken or not, if you're going to rub crotches with a complete stranger uninvitedly, don't complain if that someone ends up kicking your crotch.

 

I wasn't there so I don't know all the details but again, the guy's own friends thought he was in the wrong, so I don't know what makes you think any judge or jury would see it otherwise.

[micmac]

Susan, I would still say so, whether drunk or not. The behavior of this guy was inacceptible, but to some more grades your reaction. There are humans having a mouth to successfully repel such occurances as often proven. SH is no excuse for anything or allows anything. What you did is called bodily harm of severe grade and can bring to prison. If this guy had been in moods to bring you to court, you had had bad cards with an exuse like "he touched me before".

There goes my question: supposed this drunken guy had been your boss in office. Such happens. Am I right, you hadn´t replied the same way? Oh, what difference. Does it depend on money finally?

[Goalie]

micmac, you wouldn't be saying that if the guy wasn't drunk in a pub, correct ? A completely sober guy walking up to two girls uninvitedly and rubbing his crotch and butt in theirs is sexual harassment as far as I can tell, so are we supposed to hold people to different standards when they're drunk ?

 

My two basic rules for getting drunk, high or anything else that might obscure your judgment are:  Make sure someone is watching you or just don't.

 

This guy's friends clearly thought he was in the wrong since they apologized for his behavior later and said he was an asshole, so if they didn't see a discrepancy between cause and reaction, I don't see how we can.

[micmac]

I agree with Jennifer - it wasn´t nice and even wrong for the discrepancy between cause and reaction.

[Persis]

Thank you for sharing your story,i found it very enjoyable and very stimulating.

[Jennifer Nicholle]

that wasnt nice