because this could never happen here..

[Devoin Showerhandel]

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-d...

[J S]

And the point of this post is... what now?

[J S]

His point would appear to be a deliberately very vague implication that the female profiles on this site are fakes created by the admins to bring in more dudes, or that the women here aren't actually women.

Now please excuse me while I pick the residual tinfoil shards outta my hair.

[Pik Hansen]

I think Devoin has a point here. Noone in here can know for sure who created which account and why, but based on the many times I've seen new female members sign up in here with extremely brief profiles and never ever participating on KITG after the day they signed up, I must admit I've had the thought for a while that these were "teasers". Of course, the same applies for some new male members that you never see in here after their signing up, but since many guys are on here to get the female perspective on bb, there's much more to gain by adding fake female members.

That said, I have no idea whether or not this is the case, and most definitely we have some very real, very non-fake women in here who are here to discuss bb/cb just like the guys. Based on Karen not even getting the point of the comparison with the Ashley Madison case at first, I gather she never even had the thought that a female membership might get more males to join the site. She must be as real as it gets, as are many of the other nice ladies in here. The funny thing is that it wouldn't even be necessary to add fake females to keep the males on here, because there already are so many nice ladies here willing to indulge in bb/cb-conversations. Still, I have thought "fake!" quite a few times when a new female member joined.